Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 9-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156 |
| Golgari Midrange | slaxx | 5-0 | None |
| Dimir Control | qqqwwweee | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Mono Black Demons | brunoprince | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Dimir Midrange | reddragon8000 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Repurposing , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Sheoldred's Edict ranks #182 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 54%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 60.1%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Sheoldred's Edict is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 12.27 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.7%. Sheoldred's Edict has a win rate of 60.4%, making it 13.3% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bring the Ending | Instant | 5 | 80.0% | 5 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 5 | 66.4% | 2 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 12 | 60.4% | 3 |
| Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 66 | 59.9% | 27 |
| Get Out | Instant | 11 | 59.0% | 2 |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 74 | 56.8% | 19 |
| Tithing Blade | Artifact // Artifact | 5 | 55.1% | 0 |
| Phantom Interference | Instant | 147 | 53.2% | 40 |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 338 | 52.6% | 78 |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 341 | 52.5% | 78 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Sheoldred's Edict than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 82.4% | 64.0% | +18.4% |
| Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 5 | 6 | 78.9% | 64.5% | +14.5% |
| Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 2 | 17 | 65.5% | 64.1% | +1.4% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 18 | 65.7% | 64.8% | +1.0% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 15 | 64.4% | 63.9% | +0.6% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 17 | 65.5% | 65.0% | +0.5% |
| Faebloom Trick | Instant | 3 | 13 | 63.8% | 63.4% | +0.4% |
| Ertai Resurrected | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Human Wizard | 4 | 15 | 63.4% | 63.4% | +0.0% |
| Faerie Mastermind | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 2 | 15 | 63.4% | 63.8% | -0.4% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 24 | 63.7% | 64.4% | -0.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 559 | 27.1% | 51.2% |
| Golgari Midrange | 100 | 12.9% | 36.7% |
| Dimir Bounce | 84 | 17.1% | 56.4% |
| Mono Black Demons | 55 | 56.7% | 31.2% |
| Golgari Demons | 54 | 9.9% | 47.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.